Home / Banks / Comparison

Bank of America vs Citibank

Side-by-side credit pricing comparison from Pillar 3 disclosures.

Last updated: March 2026 · Data source: public Pillar 3 disclosures
Verdict:

On a representative BBB+ EUR 25M 5-year term loan, Bank of America is the cheaper lender by 6bp in minimum spread. For a EUR 25M facility, that's EUR 14,375 per year.

Bank profiles compared

Metric Bank of America
United States
Citibank
United States
IRB approachA-IRBA-IRB
Cost-to-income60.0%65.0%
Effective tax rate24.0%24.0%
Avg corporate PD0.73%1.21%
Avg LGD unsecured27.5%36.6%
Avg LGD secured15.0%20.0%
Funding spread (bp)12bp15bp
Corporate EADEUR 2098bnEUR 1301bn

Sample RAROC: BBB+ EUR 25M 5Y term loan

Both banks priced on the exact same deal — 150bp spread, 20bp commitment fee, 60-month maturity. Higher RAROC means the bank earns more from this deal. Lower min-spread means the borrower gets a better rate.

Component Bank of America Citibank
Annual revenueEUR 385,000EUR 385,000
Operating costEUR 154,000EUR 154,000
Expected lossEUR 28,750EUR 28,750
Capital required (FPE)EUR 2,451,320EUR 2,451,320
RAROC (after tax)7.67%7.40%
Min spread for 12% RAROC243bp249bp
This is just one sample deal.

Your actual portfolio has different ratings, sizes, maturities, and collateral. The cheapest bank for one deal isn't always cheapest for another. Upload your real facilities and OpenRAROC will run the same calculation on each, against Bank of America, Citibank, and 57 other banks.

Compare your portfolio

Read more

Bank of America full profile Citibank full profile All banks RAROC methodology

FAQ: Bank of America vs Citibank

Which bank is cheaper on corporate credit: Bank of America or Citibank?
On a BBB+ EUR 25M 5-year term loan, Bank of America requires a minimum spread of 243bp to reach a 12% RAROC hurdle, versus 249bp at the other bank — a difference of 6bp on the same deal.
How do Bank of America and Citibank compare on corporate PD?
Bank of America reports an EAD-weighted corporate PD of 0.73%, while Citibank reports 1.21%. The gap reflects differences in obligor mix and geography rather than underwriting quality.
How do the two banks differ on IRB approach?
Bank of America uses A-IRB and Citibank uses A-IRB. The IRB approach determines whether internal LGD models or supervisory LGDs apply, which materially affects capital required on every corporate facility.
What deal is used in this comparison?
A single standardised facility: BBB+ rated, EUR 25M drawn on a EUR 30M commitment, 5-year tenor, 150bp spread, 20bp commitment fee. Both banks are priced on this exact deal using their own disclosed Pillar 3 parameters.